Exhibitions

A gallery space also becomes a platform of various, individual Imaginary Places, a stage where ideas and artworks are being materialised and being seen.

The artists in the Dictionary of Imaginary Places have never before shown together, nor have they been exhibiting before in the gallery’s former locations like Ljubljana and Berlin, or now in Vienna, with only one exception.

Whereas the authors of the original, literary, Dictionary decided to restrict themselves to places that one could expect to visit, those located on our own planet, we do expand further and include a work by Markéta Magidová titled Releasing Spell, which takes place on an unknown planet, where the protagonists of her film disembark on.

Creations of Yuli Yamagata seem to have come from a universe of their own, wildly imaginative and somewhat macabre, dreamscapes populated by beings sewn and glued together from a variety of materials.

Nomad Carlos Bunga found his purpose through the use of his imagination, without which nothing can be created. He has been building his imaginary places ever since, often examining the idea of accident, or even trauma, and the ways in which we deal with it.

Helene Verhoeven takes a break from exploring the theme of ceremonial gatherings and turns to the realm of domestic isolation. In her new series, Breathless, she portrays solitude assembling images out of a triad well known from art history – Plant, Woman and Feline.

Marieta Chirulescu, whose work previously has been shown in our former space in Berlin, draws from an extensive visual archive while breaking down and erasing the images through a process of technical reproduction and manipulation. What is left, are after-images and echoes of the real world’s places.

Ann Edholm, using her geometric lexicon of shapes and her reduced color palette, creates room for memories of places, imaginary and not, searching to express the unimaginable and the unspeakable.

Angelika Loderer questions the meaning of classical sculpture and explores the boundaries of the sculptural form. The work Two Soils, Two Planets highlights one of her central subjects making the tension visible between the idea of sculpture and the absence of the body.

For Andrei Roiter, another wanderer in the group, the idea of being on the move is the defining theme. He speaks about himself as an artist-tourist that excavates memories like an archeologist preserving them in his artworks.

Alongside the four solopresentation, False Flat shows work by the following artists: Bob Eikelboom, Vera Gulikers, Mary Heilmann, Laura Lima, Edward Lipski, Mark Manders, Katja Mater, Navid Nuur, Lara Schnitger, Chaim van Luit, Julius von Bismarck, Duan Jianyu, David Lynch, Helen Verhoeven, Laura Owens, Raquel van Haver, René Daniëls, Lee Kit and Lily van de Stokker .

The focus is on the strongly changing image of women, against the background of advancing emancipation. With paintings and drawings by both female and male makers, which bear witness to female strength, talent, perseverance and beauty. The exhibition includes works by Charley Toorop, Iris Kensmil, Marlene Dumas, Jan Sluijters, Lou Loeber, Eva Besnyö, Isaac Israels, Helen Verhoeven, Thérèse Schwartze, Rineke Dijkstra and Leo Gestel, among others. The focus is on the period 1880-1950, supplemented with contemporary art that invites reflection on the present.

or otherwise distort, exaggerate or interrupt the figure to tell a non-objective truth. Here, “emotional figuration” or diffuse evocation of form emphasizes an intuitive sense of the body over the symbolic reality of the figure. A brush stroke becomes a tangle of hair that brings the neck into focus. The body’s shadow is the body. In this less objective approach, the line between subject and environment is blurred. The body hides in plain sight, integral to the environment, and the environment becomes the interior space that is a thin container for the miasma of thoughts and feelings that give rise to the self.

To commemorate this milestone, a festive anniversary exhibition titled "Border Explorers" took place this summer at the Royal Palace in Amsterdam. The exhibition was opened on Wednesday, July 14, by His Majesty the King and Her Royal Highness Princess Beatrix, emphasizing the tradition and continuity of royal attention to the art of painting.

She anoints, seduces, weeps, prays, proclaims, converts, and performs miracles. Visitors will encounter Maria Magdalena through paintings, sculptures, and photographs, and will be challenged to unravel the imagery that has developed around her over time. Was she a woman of questionable reputation, a saint, or perhaps the wife of Jesus?

Maria Magdalena: The Stage She Deserves
For centuries, artists have drawn inspiration from Maria Magdalena, from anonymous medieval masters to Marlene Dumas and David LaChapelle. With spectacular artworks from renowned national and international museums, the enigmatic Maria Magdalena finally receives the grand stage she deserves: her own exhibition. The oldest depiction on display comes from the museum's own collection and dates back to the late 11th century. The most recent work to be featured in the exhibition was painted in late 2020 by the Dutch artist Helen Verhoeven.

These were grand trans-historical gestures primarily directed outward. However, parallel to these works and in between them, in a bedroom corner and the cellar of a country cottage, Verhoeven painted her inner world. On small canvases and with a muted palette, she returned to the unsensational motif of the portrait. Using reduced compositions and old-fashioned paint recipes, she used the lockdowns to explore the elementary realm of the isolated individual. In doing so, she found a space in which to give form to our dubious emotions within the uncanny "new normal." With her ever-shifting visual languages and quirky home-made ceramic frames, Verhoeven’s portraits appear odd but quite familiar. They seem full of contradictions: intense but indifferent, dark yet also light, raw but simultaneously refined. Just so, the Puff Puff paintings manage to be on the one hand strangely disquieting while on the other they covertly console.

Features untersucht künstlerische Perspektiven auf die jüngste Geschichte und Gegenwart der Stadt. Für die Ausstellung haben zehn in Berlin arbeitende deutsche und internationale Künstlerinnen und Künstler Entwicklungen und Debatten in den Blick genommen und je ein neues, großformatiges Bild erarbeitet.

In her varied body of work, she links repressed emotions and current social dilemmas with classic historical and art-historical iconography. This is why her work initially comes across as being reassuringly recognizable -- until underlying layers with very different messages emerge. The characters in her scenes can, for instance, be perpetrators and victims at the same time; violence and intimacy can be extensions of each other. In Verhoeven's work a confusing or even unpleasant side to things is never far away.

With her installation Schamerkat, Verhoeven responds to the exhibition De schatkamer! (Treasury!), which includes top works of art from the collections of the Hermitage in St. Petersburg. In those collections the emphasis lies with beauty and creativity, worldwide and throughout the centuries. This inspired Verhoeven to create her own very diverse 'micro' collection. But with her play on words in Schamerkat, she also evokes other associations: it brings to mind the words schaamte (shame) and schemer (twilight), the darker side of existence.

As such she alludes to the other side of collecting: decadence and greed. But also to the other sides of universal themes expressed in her work, such as power, womanhood, birth and relationships. In these she continually hovers between gravity and absurdity. Characteristic of Verhoeven is the way in which she links biblical and mythological scenes to current issues and to her personal feelings and associations. The Greek god of fertility Priapos, who weighs his penis, for Verhoeven becomes a metaphor for the balance of power in relationships. An ancient statue of Heracles gave rise to a painting of savages dousing a fire by urinating on it. And confusing emotions with regard to artificial insemination led to a surrealistic stop-motion film of a woman vomiting sausages. In Schamerkat Verhoeven refuses to be limited by time and space. The works make up a Gesamtkunstwerk that invites us to look, be amazed, associate and make connections.

In large paintings, she reinterprets subjects like the Fall of man, the life of Jesus, biblical adultery, mythological rapes, unwanted pregnancies and wild brothels. Oh God approaches the drama of the old masters from a secular and contemporary perspective, and alienates the viewer from the original images. The large surfaces of the canvases show us tragic human behaviour: good deeds alongside cheating and malice, sadness, loss and humiliation. Power and helplessness stand side by side. It is as though Verhoeven has transformed the violence of our present society into the transhistorical lexicon of Christianity, in order to visualise a world that is totally incomprehensible, yet recognisable nonetheless.

On the one hand, she attempts to capture this charismatic young woman as she appears to be; on the other hand she uses her as an actor, a stand-in for the artist herself, or as a purely formal element of a composition. In each painting Libby -or her image- plays a distinctive role amidst different impossible assemblages. The paintings are crowded and employ a still life logic that is echoed in the accompanying ceramic sculptures.

In the process of developing the work, Verhoeven allowed for drastic transformations of her subject so that paint and composition could dictate the figure’s purpose. Thus Libby morphs into different personas: strange and familiar, present and absent, within and without reach. Sometimes direct, sometimes evasive. It is her, then not her. Though Verhoeven’s Libbys are visually rather cacophonous, her subject is distinctly quiet. Amidst a chaos, she sits in silence. The space around her is animated by the convergence of pictorial planes and overcrowding.

Like the pluralist persona of her subject, Verhoeven too reveals contradictory tendencies within the work: her brushwork can be crude, then careful, sometimes careless and blasé, then seemingly urgent and unapologetic. The drawing can be simultaneous clumsy and deliberate. There is a sense of conflict in the presence of both tenderness and aggression and while the placement of banal still life objects and semi-sexual references to the nude genre seem playful, the paintings are nonetheless serious and oddly severe. It is perhaps due to the cruel coexistence of the beautiful and terrible that is the current backdrop of our lives. Painting flowers and ladies while pregnant in a beautiful Berlin studio while nations collapsed, heads rolled, and Trump was elected president seemed incongruous to say the least. Verhoeven’s Libbys consequently embody both darkness and hope. As a coping mechanism perhaps, she has placed whimsical ceramic sculptures on mosaic-covered pedestals amongst her paintings so a more lighthearted and absurdist approach to the problem can also be considered.

The subjects in these new paintings return to a quieter and singular, interior space. Removed from the complexities of crowd dynamics, these solitary figures ask a reading of an inward realm.

Helen Verhoeven's paintings acknowledge a familiar set-up of young girls in early 20th century figurative art - for instance, the women who are trapped and covered by Klimt’s patterns, or the young girls of Balthus' paintings, confined to an interior space of strange domestic sexual exploitation. Distilled and reduced to rudimentary pictorial elements, the oil on canvas paintings frame their subjects within a traditional portrait-style format. Figures are in front of shallow backdrops, tapestries, and the bare minimum of domestic attributes. The girls themselves, are composed of disjointed parts, much like Hans Bellmer's dolls and are interwoven with the patterns of their surroundings. Propped up like vacant disengaged paper-dolls, that are present to role-play the many archetypes of Woman.

These female figures, caught within the precarious transitional stages between adolescence and sexuality, shift into a different form of interpretation: They are women, facing their audience from what seems like an impenetrable distance; inert, as though stuck within a perpetual endgame of waiting. The figures sense of sexuality seems very contemporary, straddling both the extremely postured and being naively innocent. The formal elements of Verhoeven's paintings ask us to consider the other elements of the work: the paint handling, the color palette, the interior details of the constructed environment, and finally, the opaque facial expression. The figures, isolated and unblinking, personify estrangement, alienation and indifference, while the paintings themselves remain seductive and warm.

The role of and means to motherhood has obviously changed in a post/part feminist world, but much of the language used to address her continues to lean towards the cliché: she is the source of all life, the nurturer, the oedipal lover, the overbearing controller, a monster. First familiar, then foreign; present, then absent; irreplaceable, omnipotent, carnivorous, beautiful, etc.

Compared with the consistent Christian renditions of Madonna and Child, film has introduced a much broader range of mother figures to our visual lexicon. Take Rosemary’s Baby (paranoid?), The Shining (frail), Psycho (controlling), Woman under the influence (hysterical), Jules and Jim (negligent), the Piano Teacher (all around abusive), or the many ‘mothers’ of 8 ½’s bathing scene (the good mother).

In 20th century painting, Mother has been addressed less frequently. She was quite prominently showcased as the ‘New Woman’ in early Soviet art and promoted as the ‘Kinder-Kirche-Küche’ woman in Nazi Germany, but generally present as whore rather than mother in most of German Expressionism. Then there are the obsessively depicted women by De Kooning, where Mother is monster, and Balthus’s female authorities, where mother/teacher is titillatingly perverse. Picasso’s weeping women are ‘suffering machines,’ while Freud’s expectant mothers are deeply—physically—human.

But all in all, motherhood has not been a popular subject. And within the canon of dead painters, I can think of only a few female artists whose mother figures I recall: Mary Cassatt, credited with the tiresome romanticized mother; Käthe Kollwitz, with her steadfast, stoic and protective mothers; Alice Neel, with her tender albeit somewhat awkward mothers; and Frida Kahlo’s heartbreaking self portraits as mother of the stillborn.
Given the rather striking poverty of painterly contributions on this topic in 20th century art, it seems there is room for new pictorial representation. The Mother paintings present fragmented women composed of many parts, much like the collaborative exquisite corpse drawings made by the surrealists. They are both best and worst case scenarios of the roles of mother and child: motherless child, childless mother, perfect union, total estrangement. Bound together by the patterns of the tapestries that surround them, and pressed up against the backdrop of shallow domestic spaces, they are merged and intertwined within three traditional female modalities: the paintings collapse the theme of ‘mother and child’ with the genre of domestic painting and the traditionally female occupation of weaving, craft, and tapestry. All this, in the hope that through visualization –free of neutralized and nullified feminist rhetoric– more nuanced and unexpected renditions of the mother figure may emerge.

'The Thingly Character’ expresses a burlesque, ‘Weimar-like’ world in which social values are abandoned and the realm of taboo is explored. Verhoeven is able to show suppressed emotions and tensions, which the group tries to camouflage. She pulls the cloth at unexpected moments to share a collective feeling of desperation; depicting scenes in which themes like power and powerlessness, guilt and innocence, submission, and dominance play a decisive role. In the psychologically charged world of Verhoeven, wealth and decadence meet a repressed desolation, dismantling any fixed notions of social stability.
Verhoeven deliberately chooses to incorporate art historical quotes referring to Hieronymus Bosch, Goya and De Chirico, among others. In addition, she appropriates material from family archives, newspapers, paparazzi pictures, and film, creating a complex series of paintings in which different times, visual languages, and psychological states collide.

Even Verhoeven's style of painting contributes to the feeling of discomfort that is evoked within her works. Her coarse naïve-like brush stroke seems to suggest that social behavior can be traced back to primitive, individual motives. For the first time, Verhoeven uses a palette consisting of black, white and gray hues. Stripped from its veneer, these colorless compositions seem to underscore the melancholic, to distill, to mute, and to create a certain distance from the viewer. Verhoeven's epic black and white scenes are reminiscent of the silent films of the '20s, but also of the grisaille underpainting of the old masters.

The centerpiece painting, which is four meters long, commands the focus of the audience and depicts the main scene. Using a myriad of styles (painterly, flat, classical, unnatural perspectives) various activities at a party are portrayed. The surrounding paintings in both exhibitions are close ups of elements taken from the main painting entitled Event One and Event Two. The small paintings crop individual interactions between the characters and focus on the details to create a new mood, different from that of the main painting.

Conceptually, both exhibitions explore the typical characteristics of an “event.” By combining different styles, and magnifying pieces of the painting, the small paintings become individual while being part of a larger event. These cropped snapshots are of portraits, still lives and different compositions from the main painting. They are the party within the party that is familiar to the audience. Verhoeven’s dark palette and relatively monochromatic red and purple hues create a quiet mood of a place where people engage physically, but are detached completely. The separation of paintings further emphasizes the idea of isolation. While being somber, there are moments of humor: the classical paintings within paintings, the play on traditional style and the anachronism of a modern party trapped in an aged interior.

A catalogue will accompany the exhibitions. This will be Verhoeven’s third solo show at Wallspace.

Events One and Two centers on a single 14-foot panoramic interior that draws from history painting and state portraiture, though, Verhoeven admits, “my work is a gross distortion of these genres.”

The rest of the exhibition builds out from this painting with a series of corresponding works that are details of the larger, made through shifting compositions, omitting or enhancing information, and by making minute alterations or distortions from one painting to the next. The project plays with languages of painting and image-making: it references Art History’s canonized (“bravado”) painters by implementing a wide range of rendering styles and borrowing, on occasion, from their cast of characters.